Why is Friends of the Everglades Involved in Legal Actions?

Friends of the Everglades was founded by Marjory Stoneman Douglas in 1969 as an advocacy group to preserve and protect the only Everglades on Earth. By the 1960s, after decades of human manipulation – driven mostly by greed and poor understanding of the flood control, water supply and ecological values that the Everglades provides – this priceless asset was in imminent danger of disappearing forever. Douglas founded Friends of the Everglades to stop the construction of a huge jetport in the Big Cypress portion of the Everglades. Due in large part to Friends’ advocacy, President Nixon scrapped funding for the project.

When state or federal governments fail to protect the Florida Everglades from pollution and other threats, then groups like Friends of the Everglades must step in to uphold the laws enacted to preserve it. Over the years, Friends has been involved in a number of legal actions to: (1) stop South Florida Water Management District from back-pumping agricultural chemicals from Big Sugar’s plantations into Lake Okeechobee; and, (2) require proper treatment of agricultural chemicals discharged to the Everglades from the Everglades Agricultural Area (“EAA”).

Friends’ legal actions have gone from federal district courts in Miami up to the United States Supreme Court and back two times. Friends’ legal victory to stop harmful back-pumping of polluted water was only stymied by a Bush Administration regulation (the Water Transfer Rule), which permitted the transfer of the most polluted water in the country into the most pristine waters, without the necessity of federal discharge permits.

Along with the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, Friends valiantly struggled in court for decades to abate agricultural chemical pollution of the Everglades. Friends’ case to abate agricultural chemical pollution of the Everglades (phosphorus) before federal district judge Alan Gold yielded significant results. Friends’ ultimate goal in this case was to ensure that the Everglades is protected from harmful effects of man-made pollution.

2008 Court Victory for Environmental Advocacy: Judge Gold Rules Against EPA in Everglades Case

Judge Gold’s Decision Highlights EPA’s Inadequate Review, Strengthening the Fight for Everglades Protection

In 2008, Judge Gold’s Summary Judgment Order sided with the Miccosukee Tribe and Friends of the Everglades against the EPA, criticizing the EPA’s approval of Florida’s environmental regulations as arbitrary. This decision emphasizes the need for rigorous environmental oversight and significantly impacts the conservation of the Everglades ecosystem.

Full Analysis

In Judge Gold’s 2008 Summary Judgment Order, the court ruled in favor of the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and Friends of the Everglades against the EPA and others. The judgment, standing since 2008, addressed two main issues: whether the EPA acted arbitrarily in approving the 2003 amendments to Florida’s Everglades Forever Act, which did not change water quality standards, and whether the EPA’s review of Florida’s Phosphorus Rule complied with the Clean Water Act. Judge Gold found the EPA’s conclusions to be arbitrary and capricious, failing to adequately analyze the impact of the amendments on water quality standards and the protection of the Everglades ecosystem. This decision underscores the need for thorough and careful environmental regulatory processes.

Judge Gold’s 2008 ruling against the EPA, affirming the positions of the Miccosukee Tribe and Friends of the Everglades, has significant implications for the Everglades ecosystem. By challenging the adequacy of the EPA’s review of Florida’s environmental regulations, this judgment emphasizes the necessity of stringent water quality standards to protect this unique ecosystem. The ruling aligns with the efforts of Friends of the Everglades, as it highlights the importance of thorough environmental oversight and the potential consequences of inadequate regulatory measures. This decision potentially aids in preserving the natural balance of the Everglades, ensuring its health and resilience against environmental threats.

Judge Gold’s 2008 Summary Judgment Order in favor of Friends

Judge Gold’s 2010 Compliance Order: A Firm Stance for Everglades Protection

2010 Order Enforces Stringent Water Quality Standards in the Everglades, Criticizing EPA and Florida’s Inaction

Judge Gold’s 2010 Compliance Order, responding to failures by the EPA and the State of Florida, mandated strict adherence to water quality standards in the Everglades, particularly regarding phosphorus limits. This critical ruling bolsters environmental protection efforts, aligning with groups like Friends of the Everglades in promoting robust environmental regulation and ecosystem conservation.

Full Analysis

In 2010, Judge Gold’s Compliance Order, standing since then, was issued in response to the EPA and the State of Florida’s failure to adhere to a previous order regarding Everglades water quality standards. The order criticized both entities for not meeting the requirements of the Clean Water Act, especially concerning phosphorus pollution limits. It mandated strict adherence to established water quality standards and required modifications to existing permits and practices to safeguard the Everglades ecosystem. This decision is crucial for ecosystem health and aligns with the conservation efforts of organizations like Friends of the Everglades, emphasizing the need for effective environmental regulation and enforcement.

The potential impact of this Order on the Everglades ecosystem is significant. By mandating strict compliance with water quality standards, it aims to prevent further ecological damage due to excessive phosphorus discharge, a factor that contributes to algal blooms and habitat degradation. This decision aligns with the objectives of groups like Friends of the Everglades, emphasizing the critical role of robust environmental regulation and oversight in preserving natural habitats.

Judge Gold’s 2010 Compliance Order in favor of Friends

EPA’s Landmark 2010 Amended Determination: A Major Step for Everglades’ Water Quality

Addressing Phosphorus Pollution – The EPA’s 2010 Response to Court Order Strengthens Water Quality Protections in the Everglades, Aligning with Conservation Goals

In 2010, the EPA’s Amended Determination responded to a court order by setting enforceable phosphorus limits in the Everglades, addressing deficiencies in the Everglades Forever Act and the Phosphorus Rule. This action marked a significant stride in protecting the Everglades’ water quality, aligning with the goals of conservation groups like Friends of the Everglades.

Read More

The EPA’s Amended Determination issued on September 3, 2010, stands as a significant legal and regulatory action to address water quality issues in the Everglades. This determination, a response to a 2010 Court Order, focused on rectifying deficiencies in the Everglades Forever Act and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Phosphorus Rule. It aimed to ensure compliance with the Clean Water Act, particularly regarding phosphorus levels in the Everglades. The EPA established enforceable limits on phosphorus discharges, with specific criteria and milestones for compliance. This document represents an ongoing effort to protect the water quality of the Everglades, emphasizing the need for enforceable Water Quality Based Effluent Limits (WQBELs) and the implementation of stringent monitoring and compliance measures.

The EPA’s Amended Determination in September 2010, in response to a court order, was a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to protect Florida’s Everglades. This document, which addressed shortcomings in the Everglades Forever Act and the Phosphorus Rule, emphasized the enforcement of Clean Water Act standards, particularly concerning phosphorus levels in the Everglades. By establishing enforceable limits on phosphorus discharges, the EPA set clear criteria and milestones for compliance.

The potential impact of this determination on the Everglades ecosystem health is significant. By reducing phosphorus levels, it aims to mitigate the risks of algal blooms and ecological imbalances that harm water quality and wildlife habitats. For organizations like Friends of the Everglades, this aligns closely with their mission to protect the Everglades and ensure water quality for Florida residents. The implementation of these stricter regulations and monitoring measures represents a critical step in conserving and restoring the Everglades, thus supporting the broader environmental efforts in the region.

EPA’s Amended Determination issued on Sept. 3, 2010

Judge Moreno’s 2010 Special Master Report: A Milestone in Everglades Environmental Oversight

Critical Assessment of EPA and District’s Compliance with Everglades Restoration Orders

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report in August 2010 rigorously evaluated the South Florida Water Management District and EPA’s compliance with restoration and protection orders for the Everglades. This report, pivotal in shaping future legal and environmental policies, underscores the importance of maintaining strict environmental standards for the ecosystem’s health.

Read More

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report from August 2010 played a crucial role in the environmental legal proceedings related to the Everglades. The report scrutinized the compliance of the South Florida Water Management District and the EPA with prior court orders focused on the Everglades’ restoration and protection. This comprehensive assessment centered on their adherence to environmental standards and legal requirements, significantly influencing future court decisions and environmental policies regarding the Everglades.

The report’s findings have profound implications for the Everglades ecosystem’s health. By ensuring strict adherence to environmental standards, it aims to prevent ecological degradation, crucial for the habitat’s preservation. This aligns with the goals of Friends of the Everglades, reinforcing the importance of legal and regulatory frameworks in safeguarding sensitive ecosystems like the Everglades.

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report, Aug. 30, 2010

Judge Moreno’s 2011 Report: A Comprehensive Review of Everglades Phosphorus Compliance

January 2011 Special Master Report Evaluates Everglades Water Management and Pollution Control

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report from January 2011 scrutinizes the South Florida Water Management District’s compliance with environmental standards, focusing on phosphorus pollution in the Everglades. This report is crucial in guiding restoration efforts and aligns with the conservation goals of organizations like Friends of the Everglades.

Read More

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report from January 4, 2011, critically examines the compliance of the South Florida Water Management District and other involved parties with existing legal and environmental requirements related to Everglades restoration. The report focuses on phosphorus reduction strategies, stormwater treatment efficacy, and adherence to water quality standards. This assessment is pivotal in guiding ongoing efforts for the Everglades’ protection and restoration.

The implications of this report for the Everglades’ ecosystem health are considerable. By emphasizing the need for effective implementation of phosphorus reduction and stringent adherence to water quality standards, the report aligns with the conservation efforts spearheaded by groups like Friends of the Everglades. It underscores the importance of consistent and rigorous environmental management practices in preserving and restoring the delicate balance of this unique ecosystem.

Judge Moreno’s Special Master Report, Jan. 4, 2011

11th Circuit Court Ruling Redefines Pollution Transfer in Florida’s Waterways

Landmark 2009 Decision Challenges Clean Water Act’s Scope on Pollutant Movement Between Navigable Waters

In a pivotal 2009 ruling, the 11th Circuit Court determined that the transfer of pollutants between navigable waters, as in the case of Friends of the Everglades versus South Florida Water Management District, does not necessitate NPDES permits, thus not violating the Clean Water Act. This decision, influenced by the EPA’s unitary waters theory, has profound implications for environmental regulation and water management practices in Florida.

Read More

The 11th Circuit Court’s decision in the case involving Friends of the Everglades and others versus the South Florida Water Management District was a significant legal development in environmental law. Initially, the case centered on whether the District needed a permit under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) before pumping polluted water from canals into Lake Okeechobee. In June 2009, the appellate court overturned the earlier judgment. The Court held that the operation of the pumps without NPDES permits did not violate the Clean Water Act (CWA). It ruled that transferring pollutants between navigable waters does not constitute an “addition” to navigable waters under the CWA.

This decision was influenced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation accepting the unitary waters theory, which regards transferring pollutants between navigable waters as not an “addition.” Consequently, the Court reversed part of the lower court’s judgment and dismissed part of the case. This overturning is significant because it shapes the interpretation of what constitutes an addition of pollutants under the CWA, impacting environmental regulation and water management practices in Florida.

From an environmental perspective, this ruling could potentially limit the scope of the Clean Water Act in addressing water pollution issues. For organizations like Friends of the Everglades, this outcome poses a challenge in advocating for stricter water quality controls, particularly in complex water systems like the Everglades. The ruling emphasizes the importance of how legal definitions and interpretations can significantly influence environmental protection efforts.

In practical terms, this decision may mean that certain water transfer activities, previously thought to require regulatory oversight, might proceed without needing NPDES permits. This could have direct implications on water management practices in Florida, particularly in areas where water bodies are interconnected and subject to pollution transfer.

11th Circuit’s Opinion in S-2/3/4 Back-pumping case

Judge Moreno’s 2011 Decision: Upholding Environmental Standards in the Everglades

2011 Ruling Reinforces Water Quality Compliance, Emphasizing EPA and District’s Responsibilities

Judge Moreno’s March 2011 decision, adopting the Special Master’s Report, focused on ensuring the South Florida Water Management District and the EPA’s adherence to water quality standards in the Everglades, especially concerning phosphorus. This ruling plays a pivotal role in ongoing environmental management efforts, aligning with conservation objectives to protect the Everglades ecosystem.

Full Analysis

Judge Moreno’s decision in March 2011, adopting the Special Master’s Report, was a pivotal moment in the long-standing environmental litigation concerning the Everglades. This ruling focused on the South Florida Water Management District and the Environmental Protection Agency’s compliance with previous court orders regarding water quality in the Everglades. Upholding the Special Master’s findings, the decision emphasized the necessity for both the EPA and the District to adhere to established water quality standards, particularly for phosphorus levels.

The significance of this decision for the Everglades ecosystem cannot be overstated. By enforcing compliance with rigorous water quality standards, this ruling aims to mitigate the detrimental effects of phosphorus pollution, such as algal blooms and habitat degradation. This aligns closely with the objectives of organizations like Friends of the Everglades, which advocate for robust environmental management and protection of the Everglades. Such decisions reinforce the critical role of legal and regulatory frameworks in preserving vital ecosystems.

Judge Moreno’s Decision, 3/22/11, adopting the Special Master’s Report

Join Our Community and Support Everglades Restoration